> BTW, in case you don't do that yet your best performance will be if > you prepare your UPDATE and INSERT statements only once and then do > bind + step + reset in that 100k times loop.
In principle I agree, but since the temporary-table version is blindingly fast up the the update-the-disk portion it's definitely not a bottleneck at this point _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
