On 28 May 2013, at 1:05pm, Roland Hughes <[email protected]> wrote:
> Your response doesn't say anything useful. > > When *WE* tell you the kit required for the project, it is just that, the kit > required for the project. Given the rules and regulations for this project > the kit must be as is without hacks. The target will run roughly 12 years > without modification unless a catastrophic bug is found. Given that such an > issue rarely shows up within the first 5 years the rules and regs require > publicly available archives. No personal hacks or desk drawer builds allowed. What Richard is telling you is that the form of URI you've used will work fine with SQLite as long as you have enabled URIs by using one of the conditions listed in section 2.0 here: <http://www.sqlite.org/uri.html> These are not hacks, they're how SQLite >= 3.7.7 works, and they're the normal way to make what you want happen. If you don't have any of those things, you get the behaviour you listed in your OP. If you do have one or more of them, and you still have the problem listed in your OP, then we have something to investigate. There's no expected problem with SQLite3 running for 12 years, by the way. I have a GPS unit older than that that uses SQLite to maintain Positions Of Interest. No problems. Simon. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
