On 23 Jun 2013, at 12:26pm, e-mail mgbg25171 <mgbg25...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> The "table as a number" idea is necessary to fit my model > where word definitions are stored as streams of code pointers (NUMBERS) > that just get called. > i.e. EVERYTHING has to be a number That makes perfect sense. If these tables all have the same fields in you might want to refactor your SQLite schema so that these tables are actually all one big table. The thing you currently consider to be a table name would just be a field in the big table. This would give you a single rowid which would indicate both the table and the (currently) row in that table. Simon. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
