What I need is 'install and don't care' because I use many C++ classes as lifetime objects. I think that my solution does work now well, but if there would be a way to avoid use of SQL parser, it would be better.
2013/7/27 Max Vlasov <max.vla...@gmail.com> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Dušan Paulovič <paulo...@gisoft.cz> > wrote: > > > Thanks for suggestion, but: > > 1.) one object is not linked to one connection > > > > If you have your own memory management, it's not a problem since the scheme > I described is basically just a storage of pointers. To free or not to free > (if the pointer points to a disposable entity) is your decision at your > chosen time. But if you want automatic reference counting (so when a > pointer not referenced anymore, it would be automatically deallocated), I > agree, the proposal is not good. Probably using your own global structure > not related to sqlite is less pain. > > > > 2.) object is not destroyed together with connection > > > > The same, you're free to use the table just as pointers storage > > Max > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
