The same NOCASE implementation is used for all database operations. I am aware of the consequences of an incorrect collation implementation. However, I do not believe that they could explain index reference to records that were deleted. Do you have any explanation for this problem?
-- View this message in context: http://sqlite.1065341.n5.nabble.com/What-can-be-deduced-from-integrity-check-tp70451p70475.html Sent from the SQLite mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
