On 14.08.2013 18:36, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Ralf Ramsauer < > ralf+sql...@ramses-pyramidenbau.de> wrote: > >> Why is it proposed not to use NFS? Why is it so risky? I can hardly >> believe that NFS locking is that broken... >> > Few of us can believe it, but many of us have had horrible experiences > (regardless of sqlite) with locking on network drives, either corruption or > 100x slower performance when file locking is used. Try it if you must, but > don't say you weren't warned. Okay, I'll try it out and stress test it. I never had such problems with NFS before. I'll want to be able to reconstruct it... > Neither cifs. > ha. Ha. HAHAHAHA!!! > > That made my day :). Cheers ;-)
Of course i prefer NFS but in some cases one doesn't get out of Cifs. Regards, -- Ralf Ramsauer PGP: 0x8F10049B _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users