On 14.08.2013 18:36, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Ralf Ramsauer <
> ralf+sql...@ramses-pyramidenbau.de> wrote:
>
>> Why is it proposed not to use NFS? Why is it so risky? I can hardly
>> believe that NFS locking is that broken...
>>
> Few of us can believe it, but many of us have had horrible experiences
> (regardless of sqlite) with locking on network drives, either corruption or
> 100x slower performance when file locking is used. Try it if you must, but
> don't say you weren't warned.
Okay, I'll try it out and stress test it. I never had such problems with
NFS before.
I'll want to be able to reconstruct it...
> Neither cifs.
> ha. Ha. HAHAHAHA!!!
>
> That made my day :).
Cheers ;-)

Of course i prefer NFS but in some cases one doesn't get out of Cifs.

Regards,

-- 
Ralf Ramsauer

PGP: 0x8F10049B

_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to