On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 08:11 -0500, John McKown wrote:
> I know that sqlite is designed as an "embedded" SQL engine. But I am
> curious if there is a specific reason to _not_ have a DLL/shared object.
> The main reason I ask is that a DLL is required in order to create a sqlite
> Java JDBC interface.
I don't regularly post to this list, but I think you are somehow
mistaken.
On my linux system I certainly use a shared library and do not link
statically to libsqlite, I clearly have:
/usr/lib/libsqlite.so.0.8.6
installed on my system.
I'm not aware of any policy/recommendation to use static linking
with sqlite (so if it builds on windows, surely people do build dlls).
Cheers,
-Tristan
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
