On Sun, Sep 1, 2013, at 19:59, Ulrich Telle wrote: > Am 01.09.2013 18:40, schrieb Etienne: > > wxSQLite is free, while SEE is definitively not. > > The original poster searched for a free encryption extension, of which > there exist several: System.Data.SQLite (RC4), wxSQLite3 (AES-128 or > AES-256), SQLCipher (AES-256 with nonce) to name a few. > > Depending on the security requirements one of the free solutions may be > good enough for the OP. > > > wxSQLite means "pseudo" encryption (as formerly discussed), while SEE is > > real encryption. > > This statement is nonsense. Certainly SEE provides stronger encryption > than wxSQLite3, however, the encryption used by wxSQLite3 is also "real" > AES encryption (not "pseudo", which implies "easy to break"). > > Regards, > > Ulrich
wxSQLite3 does implement AES in ECB mode and the SQLite file header is well known... so yes, it is definitively pseudo encryption. It might be enough for the OP's purpose (unknown so far), though. Regards, Etienne _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
