Gee... I started out in late 80's as a Dbase III+ coder. Then it was the defacto DBMS on the PC. Wonder if it still relevant in any serious application in these days.
regards Nataraj On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Darren Duncan <[email protected]>wrote: > I don't think that being ACID and SQL compliant is the definition of a > DBMS, far from it. While it is true that typically anything which is ACID > and SQL compliant is a DBMS, lots of things can be a DBMS without being > either ACID or SQL compliant. See dBASE for example. -- Darren Duncan > > > On 2013.09.01 3:11 AM, Stefan Keller wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Wikipedia answers with yes and why (= because it's ACID and SQL compliant) >> within the first three sentences! >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**SQLite<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQLite> >> >> Yours, S. >> >> >> 2013/9/1 kimtiago <[email protected]> >> >> Hi, >>> >>> I need to know if SQLite is a DBMS and why. >>> >>> Please its urgent. >>> >> > ______________________________**_________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-**users<http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users> > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
