Well finally found the problem: a forgotten sqlite3_finalize() call.

Very disturbing, I'd expect leakage, not the results I was seeing.

Normand


-----Original Message-----
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Normand Mongeau
Sent: October-30-13 9:51 AM
To: 'General Discussion of SQLite Database'
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Problem with SQLITE_BUSY

Using the straight C API of SQLite.


-----Original Message-----
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org
[mailto:sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] On Behalf Of Simon Slavin
Sent: October-30-13 9:39 AM
To: General Discussion of SQLite Database
Subject: Re: [sqlite] Problem with SQLITE_BUSY


On 30 Oct 2013, at 1:00pm, Normand Mongeau <nmong...@theobjects.com> wrote:

> Could this be related to this: in A, the database connection is 
> created in the main program, but is passed down to a dll that loads 
> another dll that uses the connection to do the writes. Maybe the dll 
> should open its own connection?

Are you addressing SQLite though its own C API, or are you using a library
which says it does SQLite things for you ?  If you're using a library, which
one ?

Simon.

_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to