On 08/11/2013 5:07 AM, Raheel Gupta wrote:
No. It's not even feature-frozen yet, as far as we know. And whenever it
is, it's incredibly unlikely to have row level locking.
Please add row-level locking if possible.
I can't think of any other single feature that would remove the "lite"
from sqlite3 more thoroughly than adding support for row-level locking
(or any other fine-grained concurrency control scheme).
I'm not an official sqlite3 dev, but I've seen the underbellies of
enough database engines to be pretty confident saying this. A good
implementation of fine-grained concurrency control and reentrancy adds a
drastic amount of complexity and overhead to a database engine, and
usually slows it down quite a bit unless you're willing to sacrifice
features or generality.
Ryan
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
