Hi, I would like to use sqlite for storing temperature data acquired every 10s running on my raspberry pi. As my first SD card died within a week with this workload, I am looking for opportunities to reduce write operations triggered by fsyncs to flash. For me loosing 1h of data at a power failure isn't an issue, however the DB shouldn't be corrupt afterwards.
I found the pragma "synchronous", which when set to "NORMAL" does seem to do exactly what I am looking for - when sqlite is used in WAL mode. Am I right that with this configuration, fsync is only executed very seldomly? > In WAL mode when synchronous is NORMAL (1), the WAL file is synchronized > before each checkpoint > and the database file is synchronized after each completed checkpoint and the > WAL file header is synchronized > when a WAL file begins to be reused after a checkpoint, but no sync > operations occur during most transactions. Thank you in advance, Clemens _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
