Thanks both for the tips. Well, it looks like I'm barking up the wrong tree here, the suggestions might work in principle but unfortunately wont handle changes to the underlying database without requiring changes to whatever solution is applied.
> But this will be ugly SQL, it will be convoluted (especially for 100 > columns, although you may not need all 100) and I am unsure as to how fast > it will execute - but worth a shot if it's just a quick fix needed. > Yes, this gets ugly especially as we are talking about almost 100 tables with probably 100+ columns in each. I guess I need to sleep on this for a moment. Staffan _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
