> On 3 Sep 2014, at 5:24am, Bob Moran <bmo...@cicaccess.com> wrote: > > Found more of what the issue is. I noticed that my SQL text was being > overwritten on the return from the call to prepare_v2. > Stepping through the SQlite3 code I discovered that a malloc call for 500+ > bytes was returning a pointer 8 bytes below my SQL string. > Don't have the foggiest notion as to why. My string is on the heap. If I wait > some time before making the call (my program is just waiting for input, then > the malloc call returns a pointer far removed from my passed in SQL text. > Must be some kind on Linux issue?
Are you using a SQLite library or including the amalgamation source code ? If you're using the SQLite source are you using any SQLite compiler defs ? Which compiler are you using ? Simon. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
