Am 07.09.2014 um 21:52 schrieb Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org>:

> 
> On 7 Sep 2014, at 7:19pm, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
> 
>> mailingli...@skywind.eu> wrote:
>> 
>>> Is it possible to change the fourth parameter in sqlite3_bind_XXX (and
>>> probably other locations) because this seems to be for me the appropriate
>>> type?!
>> 
>> No.  That would be a compatibility break.
> 
> To supplement Richard's answer, I understand that this problem will be solved 
> in SQLite4, which can rely on size_t from the outset.
> 
> Simon.
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Can it also be solved in SQLite3 by overloading versions that support size_t as 
a parameter?

As Roger pointed out ignoring the warning or implementing just a cast is 
insufficient. In case of an overloaded function the SQLite limits could also be 
handled correctly.

Regards,
Hartwig

_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to