On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Mark Lawrence <no...@null.net> wrote:
> > I understand that that behaviour exists and applies when an insert does > not provide a value, but I don't see the contradiction. The table > defines an *explicit* default that should (to my mind) override any > kind of magical-in-the-absence-of-a-default-default. Such an explicit > default should certainly not be accepted if it is going to be ignored. > I will make an effort to clarify this in the documentation. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
