On 11/25/2014 5:41 PM, Simon Slavin wrote:
Fair point. I should have written 'writing concurrency'. I would be interested in anything you have to say about the article I referred to.
I don't see much in the way of reasoning in that article, and I'm too lazy to look at the code. Insofar as the article defines "serializable" as "behaving as if executed serially", transactions in SQLite are trivially shown to be serializable - because they are, in fact, forced to be executed serially.
-- Igor Tandetnik _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
