I've read through all the other posts on this thread, and I must agree. Your "serverless" configuration can't exist because each client becomes a server, BY DEFINITION, when it starts PROVIDING information to other clients.
I've written a book, by now, when this topic comes up. Believe me Alessandro, you're not the only one that wonders why. So for you, and all my future writing endeavors, to save the planet some electricity due to the servers of the world having to deal with my words, and, well, because I don't want to flood a novel worth of text to all followers of this mailing list who may not WANT to read what I say, I've written a blog post on this very subject. http://randomthoughts.ca/index.php?/archives/7-Serverless-Servers-using-NFS-Why-it-cant-happen.html In conclusion, no. There is no safe way to use SQLite on any NFS. See the link above to find out why. On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:29 PM, A. Mannini <alessandro.mannini at esod.it> wrote: > Hi, > > i read SQLite FAQ and understood that use of SQLite on network share CAN > corrupts database file. > Fo me, it isn't clear if there is a way to safely use SQLite on a > network share in contests with few clients (max 5 for ex) and low read / > write concurrency.. > > Thanks > Alessandro > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users >
