On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:24:03 +0100 Clemens Ladisch <clemens at ladisch.de> wrote:
> > You've solved the problem by compiling for a single-threaded > > environment. > > No; the single-threaded environment is the problem. That's a matter of opinion. Another way to look at it: threads set back computing by 20 years. Protected memory was invented for good reason. Then it was uninvented, and we're still dealing with the fallout. Software transactional memory has so far failed to pass muster, and communicating sequential processes has still not seen implementation support in most languages. --jkl
