On 21 Sep 2015, at 12:20am, Scott Robison <scott at casaderobison.com> wrote:
> Then just go with something like ((rowid - rowid) <> 0). The basic premise > still holds that it should be easy to come up with a condition that is > always false. Hmm. That tells me what I should have used in the first place: WHERE 0 = 1. Simon.
