On Feb 15, 2016, at 1:02 AM, Clemens Ladisch <clemens at ladisch.de> wrote: > > SQLite uses a much simpler locking scheme that can be faster if there > aren't concurrent accesses. SQL Server has higher concurrency.
SQLite also doesn?t have the IPC overhead of a client/server DBMS, so if you don?t need concurrency or remote access, SQLite can be faster, since all data is moved around inside a single process.