Thank you for your reply ! I understand your point.
But without remove your freedom could we have somehow an optional callback that could be registered to receive what the parser found ? It's a shame that we can not reuse the parser power ! Can we have something that do not remove your freedom and can provide a way to reuse the parser power ? Cheers ! ? > Mon Jan 18 2016 2:15:04 pm CET CET from "Richard Hipp" <drh at sqlite.org> >Subject: Re: [sqlite] Wish list: allow developers use the power of >sqliteparser > > On 1/18/16, Domingo Alvarez Duarte <sqlite-mail at dev.dadbiz.es> wrote: > >>Hello Richard ! >> >> Can we have a sqlite function that given a sql string return something >>like >> this https://codeschool.github.io/sqlite-parser/demo/ => >> >> Syntax Tree ? >> > No. > > That would make the abstract syntax tree an interface, which means > that we would not be able to refactor it in the future without > breaking backwards compatibility. We do not change the AST format > often, but it does happen. And we want the continued freedom to > further modify the AST without having to think about what applications > those changes might break. > > -- > D. Richard Hipp > drh at sqlite.org > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > > > ?
