Thanks, I suspect there's indeed some special behavior not obvious at the moment. I'll try to gather some additional information if it's possible or detect this specific behavior
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Richard Hipp <drh at sqlite.org> wrote: > On 3/10/16, Max Vlasov <max.vlasov at gmail.com> wrote: > > I have a compatibility problem with my vfs implementation of memory > > databases. > > > > As I see from the version history page that no specific vfs-related > changes > > for 3.8.3 were reported, only a major change that can affect structure > and > > vfs is initial common table expressions implementation. > > > > What are the changes that might trigger the change? > > Dunno. The changes to the unix VFS were minimal > ( > https://www.sqlite.org/src/fdiff?v1=f076587029285554&v2=f3ed0e406cbf9c82&sbs=1 > ) > and likewise the windows VFS > ( > https://www.sqlite.org/src/fdiff?v1=4323dd0bac4f7a70&v2=1b21af72c5fa6f9e&sbs=1 > ). > Perhaps your in-memory VFS was relying on some unspecified behavior > that changed? Without access to your source code, it is difficult to > say. > > -- > D. Richard Hipp > drh at sqlite.org > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users >
