>> As for public domain, I'm happy to put the sources under a similar
>> license.  I can't speak for the voodoo of the public domain and the EU
>> (or is it country-by-country?), however.
> 
> From an English translation I found of the Latvian law includes moral
> rights and is closer to the droit d'auteur than copyright. So it seems
> difficult to place your work in the public domain.
> 
> I would advise you to contact the FSF, FSFE Legal or SFLC in this matter
> if you want a general advice without legal fees. This entire topic as
> been discussed in context of Wikimedia's projects, especially Wikipedia
> and Wikimedia Commons, and CC0, so you might find information about
> Latvia there.

Matthias-Christian,

I'm afraid I can't say anything useful about licenses, but in searching
around, it appears that you're correct[1].

Assuming, arguendo, that this is true, I'm happy to continue keeping the
source where it is and tracking the header file--something I'd need to
do anyway, of course, regardless of where it sits.  Or if, as Richard
intimated, an ISC licensed file is acceptable in docsrc, it may be kept
there.  I'm open to suggestions!

Regarding the system itself, are there any desired features or
invocations that I can implement for ease of use and/or utility?  It
emits pretty standard mdoc(7) markup except for the IMPLEMENTATION
NOTES, which is non-canonical (but documented), where I stash the actual
declarations themselves.  In short, the manpages have everything in them
that I would need as a user.

Best,

Kristaps

[1] http://www.satori.lv/raksts/4336/Autortiesibasunbriva_kultura
(Link contents in Latvian.)

Reply via email to