On 26.06.2007 00:24 CE(S)T, WHITE, DANIEL wrote: > The main advantage of mine is that it is lightweight and easy to use > without using ADO.NET.
Okay, the other SQLite.NET DLL has 592 kB, that's not necessarily "lightweight". I'd like to be able to include the SQLite library into the main assembly so that I won't need a separate DLL anymore. I'm not sure though how good that works with each solution or whether it's a good idea for other reasons. But I'm quite happy with it without using ADO.NET. In fact, I don't like the idea of copying each and every record into memory and having it sorted and filtered there (which ADO.NET propagates) instead of having that done directly in the source database engine... -- Yves Goergen "LonelyPixel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Visit my web laboratory at http://beta.unclassified.de ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
