Hi.
There is a difference between FULL and PARTIAL union injections. With full
you can get the content of whole table with one query, while in partial you
have to go row by row.
There should be no difference between 0.9 and 1.0 in retrieveing
Kind regards
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Iago Sousa <146050...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's normal?
>
> In sqlmap0.9, some websites we could get information by union, like
> group_concat; it took all the information inside the DB with one query.
>
> In sqlmap1.0/dev, it's very slow, gettin' info one-by-one char; I've that
> use 2 or more threads.
>
> My english is not so good, I'm learning yet.
> --
> Iago Sousa
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
> _______________________________________________
> sqlmap-users mailing list
> sqlmap-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlmap-users
>
>
--
Miroslav Stampar
http://about.me/stamparm
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
sqlmap-users mailing list
sqlmap-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlmap-users
