On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 10:10:29AM -0500, Rick Flosi wrote:
> I think it might not exist b/c it isn't very SQLObjecty.
> You'd be returning an object with a new field in it, SUM(), which isn't
> part of the SQLObject and probably a subset of the SQLObject fields as
> well. This isn't very OO which is what I think SQLObject was designed for.
Sean have promised to try to produce a patch, but I am sure it would be
very hard to create a proper sqlobjectish design for this excessive column.
Should the designer add it to sqlmeta.columns? should it be a read-only
property?
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
