On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 07:10:09PM +0300, Dan Pascu wrote:
> So it seems that for objects that are obtained from classes derived from
> object (strings, dictionaries, Obj(object), ...) it won't reuse the
> addresses, but for objects that result from old style (pre 2.2) classes
> it seems it will.
I think this is caused by the different handling of new and old-style
classes by the garbage collector. Instances of the old-style classes are
freed immediately, instances of the new style classes are left dormant
until gc collects them.
Or may be the existence of __del__ changes the handling. With __del__
instances are freed immediately, without it are left for later collecting.
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
