Jorge Vargas wrote:
> On 10/24/06, Ilias Lazaridis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...

>>>>> there or to find a different hosting, or abandon it completely. It is
>>>>> meaningless to have a tracker that nobody uses.
>>>> the most important part of trac is the front-end to the SVN, as it is a
>>>> very convenient way to track development.
>>>>
>>> I disagree the most important feature for me is the ticket system with
>>> the query module it's simple and powerfull
>> the combination of SVN&wiki&Ticket is the most important part of trac.
>>
>> the ticket's alone are 'peanuts', nothing special.
>>
> no it isn't trac's tickets are far superior then sourceforge. same as
> with the roadmap,etc.

I did not compare it to sourceforge (which has a terrible usability).

>> So, it's nearly meaningless to have a trac without a connected repository.
>>
> then I guess we have to agree to disagree

possibly.

And in extension:

trac hosting wihout svn hosting is quite useless.

>>>> this depends currently on having the SVN and TRAC on the same host.
>>>>
>>>> But possibly you can find a solution.
>>>>
>>> did you read the other thread I posted 2 ways of working around this
>> which other thread?
>>
>> (I'm reading this group via gmane nntp)
> 
> he probably reply but changed the subject, which is suficient on a
> mailing list, probably your newsgroup interface is "smart" enough to
> think of them as the same thing

ok, that happens.

Thunderbird has displayed it within the same thread (

sorry!

.

-- 
http://lazaridis.com


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss

Reply via email to