On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 09:08:39PM +0100, jonhattan wrote:
> So I have two questions.
>
> first is, shouldn't it work with the last class definition I've shown?
No, RelatedJoin was designed to be used symmetrically; you have to have
two RelatedJoins pointing to each other.
> second, could SQLObject create the table on first RelatedJoin it found,
> instead of on the one resulting on applying the alphabetical sort?
Currently no, but you can try to extend SQLObject. Patches (that work)
will be gladly accepted.
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
