On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 01:25:00AM -0700, Andy Grover wrote:
> Could the call to .set() in
> _SO_setvalue perhaps suppress the second RowUpdateSignal (since any
> added values must have been added in the first call to RowUpdateSignal)
Any patch?
> or only call .set() for added items in the dict?
No, or else the first updated value would not be written to the DB.
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
