On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:42:58PM +0100, Bert Wesarg wrote: > Is there an other 'join' I > should use for the case, where I only want in one class to get a > 'addRole' function, but not a 'addPerson' function?
No. But if you don't need addPerson - just don't call it. add*s are symmetric, you may call one but not the other. It is up yo you. > And as a second question, how to get something like a dependency tree? http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2004/08/05/hierarchical_sql.html http://www.codeproject.com/cs/database/Trees_in_SQL_databases.asp http://www.google.com/search?q=%22hierarchical+SQL%22+OR+%22tree+in+SQL%22+OR+%22trees+in+SQL%22 Oleg. -- Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ sqlobject-discuss mailing list sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
