That's a witty idea. I'll use that on my project.
Thanks
-fred-
On Dec 15, 2007, at 8:27 PM, Luke Opperman wrote:
>
>>> No, RelatedJoin doesn't expose an API to do a join with the
>>> intermediate
>>> table.
>>
>> Ok, that what I thought. I'll do the join myself then.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -fred-
>
> However, you're certainly free to have both a RelatedJoin and a
> MultipleJoin, ie:
>
> class Mbox(SQLObject):
> ...
> msg_to = RelatedJoin("User")
> msg_to_status = MultipleJoin("MboxUser")
>
> for user_status in message.msg_to_status:
> print user_status.status
> print user_status.user
>
> for user in message.msg_to:
> ...
>
> - Luke
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services
> for just about anything Open Source.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
> _______________________________________________
> sqlobject-discuss mailing list
> sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services
for just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
