On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 07:21:04PM -0500, inhahe wrote:
> Can someone help me understand this? I thought the whole point of a
> TimestampCol was to automatically stamp the creation of a record with
> the current time and date -- otherwise you might as well use a
> DateTimeCol. yet when i try to create a new instance of a table with
> a TimestampCol without specifying the TimestampCol keyword, it gives
> me an error. if i have to tell it what to put, why even have a
> TimestampCol()? So what am I supposed to pass it to make it stamp it
> with the current time?
I think you need TimestampCol(default=None) on creation. Can you test it
and report if it works? Then I will add to my TODO to make this the
default.
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ p...@phd.pp.ru
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
