+1
VIEW is, IMHO, en excelent way to go, when the SQLObject is close to its
limits.
Petr
On 1 July 2010 18:28, Oleg Broytman <p...@phd.pp.ru> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 03:48:38PM +0000, Mark wrote:
> > Even if you weren't using SQLObject I believe it would make more
> > sense to create a separate name/id table and then only select
> > from the 40 column table when you know what row you want.
>
> Or use a VIEW.
>
> Oleg.
> --
> Oleg Broytman http://phd.pp.ru/ p...@phd.pp.ru
> Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
> What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
> Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
> _______________________________________________
> sqlobject-discuss mailing list
> sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
sqlobject-discuss mailing list
sqlobject-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlobject-discuss
