-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3600/#review4566
-----------------------------------------------------------


Looks good. Have you run manual tests with it too?


src/test/com/cloudera/sqoop/TestAvroImport.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/3600/#comment10194>

    You should check that the files that are written are compressed (by looking 
at DataFileReader's metadata).
    
    We also need a test for --compress.


- Tom


On 2012-01-24 14:07:58, Lars Francke wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/3600/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-01-24 14:07:58)
> 
> 
> Review request for Sqoop.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> This basically only ports all the code from Avro's (1.5.4) AvroOutputFormat 
> to the new MR API.
> 
> I've changed the test to extract the common functionality into a helper 
> method because they are the same apart from the two command line arguments.
> 
> I could have deleted AvroJob completely but as I was told last time that 
> binary compatibility needs to be maintained I left it in. It's not needed 
> anymore as all necessary functionality can be gotten from Avro's own version 
> of that file as far as I can tell. So if it's okay to delete that redundant 
> file (two actually, cloudera and apache package) let me know and I'll provide 
> a new patch.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug SQOOP-428.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-428
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/java/org/apache/sqoop/mapreduce/AvroJob.java a57aaf1 
>   src/java/org/apache/sqoop/mapreduce/AvroOutputFormat.java 96befd7 
>   src/test/com/cloudera/sqoop/TestAvroImport.java 1b8b046 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3600/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All tests pass for hadoopversion=20 but TestColumnTypes fails for me on 23. I 
> can't see how that's related though.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lars
> 
>

Reply via email to