mherger wrote: > > C'mon!... now that I've started to look into the RandomPlay > bottlenecks > > with a 100k "collection" :-). There definitely is some unnecessary > > overhead. But I'm not sure this could be turned into one snappy action > > > without re-implementing a lot of the performance critical code. > > That said: starting a mix using those 100k tracks takes about 3-4 > seconds on my MacBook. I have no idea why twice or three times that > number would take minutes to start. > > -- > > MichaelStarting a random mix on a Pi 3 with around 47000 tracks takes long enough to stop playback for about 20 seconds while playing a 320k radio station. Playback continues for 10 seconds after triggering the song mix before stopping so 30 seconds in total before the mix plays. I have performance set to normal though.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ slartibartfast's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35609 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=109078 _______________________________________________ Squeezecenter mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/squeezecenter
