mherger wrote: > >> 10,000 file full scan took about twice as long as 1.10.b1 at 484 > >> seconds. > > > > My system seemingly has slower disks, as an 100.000 files full scan > > takes about three hours here. > > Or you have different NAS models. ARM vs. Intel CPU, 4GB RAM vs. 512MB > etc. And with a library your size it's crucials to use the high memory > options. Using Maximum (if you have <1GB RAM) can greatly improve > performance. See Settings/Advanced/Performance. > > -- > > Michael
Yes, my NAS is a dual-core J1800 Celeron with 8Gb RAM, but your library is also 10 times larger than mine. I'd forgotten to check the performance setting, but after a bit of experimentation there seems to be <10% difference in scan time whether database memory config is set to normal, high or maximum and whether scanner priority is set to normal 0 or -20. Presumably this is because the CPU and memory resources in this NAS are more than enough for a smaller library. LMS 7.9.2 | Touch | Boom | Boom | SB3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SMC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9162 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=108292 _______________________________________________ Squeezecenter mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/squeezecenter
