aidy_w wrote: 
> Dooooh, that works. My most sincere apologies. I had indeed made a
> simple mistake. I slipped a space between the directive and the address,
> because the daemon started even with the space in place, I assumed it
> was simply not responding.... I failed then to check netstat, which
> under this condition shows no process listening on port 9000. Running
> daemon no binding. Dooooh
> 
> So, finally, it was simple after all. Now I feel pretty stupid.
> 
> Having said that, I will stick with what I have done, there is a subtle
> reason. Because the netns is attached to a bridge in the root netns, its
> IP address is different and totally independent of the interface withitn
> the root netns. This means I don't have to consider it in any iptables
> rules with regard to traffic between it and its clients. It has clear
> unobstructed L2 visibility of my LAN. As its in the same subnet as all
> my other LAN traffic, my rules on the internet link can also remain
> exactly the same. 
> 
> It has been an interesting exercise.
> 
> As I probably have your attention, for the wrong reasons I'm
> sure.....please allow me to ask another quick question. I wont open
> another topic just in case I am again being so dumb :/
> Is there a reason why the squeeboxserver does not integrate the same
> functions as the controller for the DUET products. Specifically UDAP. I
> have 2 DUET receivers and recently the controller failed, well not
> failed exactly but the only way I have it working is on the bench with
> wires hanging out of  it. If I hard reset the DUET receiver, the
> squeezeboxserver does not attempt to connect and configure them. Is this
> by design. It would be very useful if it did. In effect, without the
> controller the receivers become unusable.
> 
> Sorry again for wasting your time.
> Thanks for the help.
> AidanThis is the thread for net udap
https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink?url=https%3A%2F%2Fforums%2Eslimdevices%2Ecom%2Fshowthread%2Ephp%3Ft%3D57861&share_tid=57861&share_fid=813&share_type=t

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk




------------------------------------------------------------------------
slartibartfast's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=35609
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=109668

_______________________________________________
Squeezecenter mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/squeezecenter

Reply via email to