marcoc1712 wrote: 
> YEs!
> 
> that's exactly where I'm losing my mind on...
> 
> Just to be sure, please forgive my pedantry
> 
> LMS is reporting that you are now using Perl 5.30 and Audo::Scan 1.02,
> correct?
> 
> If so, it looks like Scan.pm is loaded from:
> 
> /usr/share/squeezeboxserver/CPAN/arch/5.30/Audio/Scan.pm
> 
> that load the bin from
> 
> /usr/share/squeezeboxserver/CPAN/arch/5.30/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Audio/Scan.so
> 
> or do you have a different architecture to load from, like 
> 
> /usr/share/squeezeboxserver/CPAN/arch/5.30/aarch_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/Audio/Scan.so
> 
> 
> or similar?
> 
> That 's the difference from your case and gentoo on ARM, where it does
> not works and it try to use version 1.01,  and i could not understand
> how it could be, given the source code.
> 
> Thanks for your Help.

Hm, sorry to have confused you. 
As said, afraid I moved my LMS install in between earlier post from
docker container on kubernetes to a now bare metal installation; trying
to get rid of hickup in 2 levels upsampling... Seems there is a some
difference to the docker image I used before... Information screen now
at least shows:
28938

I rerun my container on the cluster to check and that shows I previously
I had on that container perl 5.24.1 - aarch64-linux-gnu-thread-multi and
Audio::Scan 0.95)

I hope it is all clear enough to you now?!


+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Filename: lms_07012020.PNG                                         |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=28938|
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Huey11's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=67632
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=105309

_______________________________________________
Squeezecenter mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/squeezecenter

Reply via email to