mherger wrote: > > Attached is the serverlog. > > Could you please provide the scanner.log, too? > > > I am trying to finish the scan in High, not maximum performance. > > Oh... that means that the previous scanner.log is lost... what a pity > :-( > > > Mem: 983680K used, 15360K free, 119872K shrd, 1320K buff, 327964K > > cached > > "used" is high, as is "cached" - which means there still was some slack > > at this moment. Did you ever see cached, buffered etc. go really low? > > -- > > Michael
I am very sorry for having missed the scan file. Maybe I can go ahead in the next few days and try again. Even with memory on high, it did not finish the scan, itÂ’s canceled unexpectedly on database optimization. The memory usage was always this high. I had to restore my old image, and this one runs fine. With this image, the memory usage is the same. I also went ahead and ordered a raspberry PI 4. The Earth Has Music For Those Who Listen ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pommes's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=67682 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=113445
_______________________________________________ Squeezecenter mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/squeezecenter
