MrC Wrote: > Because you can't make enough profit from stingy bastards! :-) >
yes but the service would be for *both* stingy bastards and rich gits. As I say, streamload wouldn't do it if it cost them money. MrC Wrote: > > Seriously, I think most everyone wants control of their own music. I > can't imaging uploading 50-100G of music, and having that be cost > effective for anyone - Slim, you, ISPs, etc. > I agree totally. I would keep control of my music by having it on a hard drive in my house (as well as on streamload) Uploading 50G of music? Well, that is quite a lot. Maybe 5G is more realistic (though that is still 100 albums in MP3). It would run overnight. No problem. MrC Wrote: > > Why not just turn off your server when you're not using it, and turn it > on when you are? Well yes. That's what I do. That's what's inconvenient. -- clumsyoik _______________________________________________ squeezenetwork mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/squeezenetwork
