dean Wrote: > On Aug 1, 2006, at 11:54 PM, yjv wrote: > > i think the SqueezeNetwork idea is of course great but i'm missing > > lots > > of features :-) like some stuff like import/export favorites and > > settings, i mean this would be really important. and the web radio > > search functionality. this would mean not alot of additional network > > traffic. > I'd love to start a discussion here about what features folks want. > Our goal is to make SqueezeNetwork the best place on the internet to > connect your Squeezebox (or Transporter!) >
well great! why dont we do a poll ? thats kind of easy for everybody and if the questions are smart the output can be even used :) is poll function in this forum? dean Wrote: > > > > iv also been thinking of some kind of plugin functionality for the > > SqueezeNetwork.com, this would open even more posibilitys?! > > what do you think? > > We've discussed this a little bit but haven't figured out the best way > to open it up while being able to maintain maximum uptime and avoid > security risks. Let's talk here! ok cool, i mean i totally agree, uptime is of course the absolute top priority. but actually i think it should be posible to have a "plugin-bridge" some XML or so, just the basic data. i think it should be possible to even have the plugin-software running on other physical servers. so the top priority would remain. now the thing would be to avoid security risks of course. now lest asume there would be some kind of XML "plugin-bridge" way to communicate from the plugin-software to the core-squeeznetwork.com-software? or lets have a look at it the other way... lets say there is a fix core-part like linux the kernel :) that would be in this case the core-squeeznetwork.com-software. this would be core functions (control different players from the web to anywhere and edit playlist whatever fits to core). around the core there would be the rest-of-the-software. some kind of way to add functional tools in the "web 2.0 style" but those tools should not afect the core. example: probably you guys know www.gmail.com well if you dont have a "modern" browser then you will get a simpler webmail-gui with less "web 2.0" fonctionality but the core-fonctions still work, send manage email etc. probably you also know those "web 2.0" websites (they have many nice online tools that SqueezeNetwork.com should have today) - http://www.plaxo.com/ - http://www.flickr.com/ - http://maps.google.com/ the last webpage gives me another idea. maps.google.com has the solution. a core and the so called "Google Maps API" probably you guys also allready know this? of course you dont have as many servers as google i asume =) but hey this should be posible some way! lets keep this idea-on-going -- yjv ------------------------------------------------------------------------ yjv's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6567 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26051 _______________________________________________ squeezenetwork mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/squeezenetwork
