On Jul 31, 2008, at 9:42 AM, FredFredrickson wrote: > > I applaud the efforts- but am I about to shoot myself in the foot by > saying.. I thought 128 sounded just fine..? (and I can't tell the > difference with 192?) > > I know! I know! I need to go out and buy those gold-plated monster > ethernet cables that cost $800 to really hear the subtle differences > and nuances.. > > I can certainly tell below 128. > > Maybe I should do a 128 vs 192 side by side comparison.. > > *hands in audiophile-in-training card*
I'm no audiophile either, but 192 sounds a lot better than 128 to me. It could very well be imagined, I haven't done a blind test. Also switching to mp3 should have given us gapless playback in Rhapsody, which would have been a much better benefit, but unfortunately all of their tracks were somehow encoded wrong so there is no gapless. :( _______________________________________________ squeezenetwork mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/squeezenetwork
