> The Foundation board has had a bit of discussion about this proposal > during the last meeting and countered with a different proposal for > consideration. Otherwise are split over whether to change at all, and > with good reasons on all sides of he decision. > > > Proposal 2) > > We are developing Squid with an incremental development process. The > initial major version number is effectively meaningless in that process. > We should move from the major.minor.patch to just a release.patch > numbering system. > > This would mean this years upcoming major series would be 4.x, and next > years would be 5.x and so on. > > There are quite a lot of infrastructure changes involved with that big a > change, and its not entirely clear how the beta releases would be > represented - perhapse not having any beta releases at all?
Beta releases can be managed just like they are now: MAJ.0.X would be beta MAJ.Y (Y>=1) would be stable > If the issue of betas can be resolved in a good way I am inclined to go > with proposal #2 myself. Lacking that with proposal #1. > > > > We still have a few months to think about this before a final call is > made. All ideas and opinions welcome. +1. Guys, please speak up :) Kinkie _______________________________________________ squid-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
