On 12/04/2015 05:49 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > On 04/12/2015 08:51, Alex Rousskov wrote: >> The -n approach is overall better than _str suffix approach because the >> former makes it easy to mix-and-match multiple flags and to support >> flags with values such as -m=delimiters.
> The only real differences that I can understand(after almost 24 hours > straight no sleep) is that admins are used to use "-n" in many unix tools. The important difference between the -x flag and the _x suffix is that when you have five flags (and we will!), some with additional parameters and some without, the _suffix syntax becomes an impediment while the "command line options" syntax that admins are used to continues to work well. Compare: acl foo dstdomain_a=4_b_c=__d v1 with acl foo dstdomain -a=4 -b -c=_ -d v1 > So +1 for both ideas but another +0.5 to dstdomain_str just because I > sometimes just don't like -n and all sort of cryptic meanings that > shortened words or flags have. Your dislike of the letter n is noted. IMO, it was an OK choice because -n is often used for --dry-run "do nothing" options and that is what -n is kind of about in Squid ACL context. I am sure any other single letter would have raised some objections too. Nobody stops us from supporting longer flag names, of course. Many modern programs (that admins are familiar with) support them. I would welcome patches adding such support, but support for longer flag names is a completely separate issue IMO. Thank you, Alex. _______________________________________________ squid-dev mailing list squid-dev@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
