On 9/07/2016 6:19 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote: > On 07/07/2016 04:16 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: >> >> I certainly regret that you think anything at all of the current logic >> should be retained in ConnStateData. > > I do not think that. There are known/marked HTTP- and FTP-specific > pieces in ConnStateData that should be moved. There are a couple of BB2 > pieces as well. And other stuff, I am sure (this is not a comprehensive > list). >
I have made a comprehensive list of the parts which need to stay, the remainder need to go... > >> Whichever way we go what the ::Server needs is: > > ... Snipped to avoid discussing complex design issues irrelevant for > this thread. I agree with some of the items you listed, but not > necessarily all of it, and there may be missing items... > If you are going to throw away the technical details about what needs to stay and what needs to go. Then we have reached a deadlock again. We are planning how to go from a tangled ConnStateData to a clean and documented ::Server. It is very important that we know and agree on what the goal looks like before we try arguing approaches to get there. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
