I have a question which now bumped me.. As I see it, could it be that nobody until now actually used so many cache_dirs or\and cache sizes? And due to this we didn't encountered this issue?
Eliezer ---- Eliezer Croitoru Linux System Administrator Mobile: +972-5-28704261 Email: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: squid-dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Amos Jeffries Sent: Saturday, July 9, 2016 4:37 PM To: Squid Developers Subject: [squid-dev] [PATCH Bug 4534 and N-bit fixes for CacheDigest This patch converts the CacheDigest members and method parameters to use explicitly sized data types more appropriate for what details they hold. * 64-bit Digest capacity (entry count) * 32-bit Mask Size (byte count) * 8-bit Bit count per entry Due to various store_digest.cc code still relying on masks not exceeding 2^31-1 worth of memory space we have to still assert that bitCount calculation does not exceed that value. Amos _______________________________________________ squid-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
