On 8/16/21 7:29 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > -c .../src/log/access_log.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/access_log.o > In file included from .../src/log/access_log.cc:12: > In file included from .../src/AccessLogEntry.h:19: > In file included from .../src/HttpHeader.h:13: > In file included from .../src/base/LookupTable.h:15:
> /usr/include/c++/v1/unordered_map:857:5: error: static_assert failed > due to requirement 'is_same<std::__1::pair<const SBuf, unsigned long > long>, std::__1::pair<uf, unsigned long long>>::value' "Invalid > allocator::value_type" > static_assert((is_same<value_type, typename > allocator_type::value_type>::value), > ^ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yes, that could be the smoking gun missing from the earlier error log, thank you, Stuart! Francesco, can you reproduce the same false is_same<> result using a toy example? You might not even need Squid-specific types. If you can reproduce it, is the result valid/expected or is that a clang bug? Alex. _______________________________________________ squid-dev mailing list squid-dev@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
