On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 2:39 PM Alex Rousskov <
rouss...@measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> On 6/7/22 17:53, Francesco Chemolli wrote:
> > This is exactly what I meant and what I see happening.
> > I'd like us to concentrate on clearing as much as possible the PR
> > backlog to capitalise on the work many have put in there, prioritising
> > that over new feature work for a few days.
>
> I am not sure, but I sense that you are not satisfied with the list of
> the PRs that I said I am working on. If that is the case, you may want
> to clarify what you think I should be doing instead. FWIW, I thought
> that working on the listed PRs will reduce the number of PRs and, hence,
> reduce "backlog of open PRs" which, I thought, was what your 15-day
> sprint suggestion was about...
>
No, I am very happy about the sprint we are doing.
My point is that that one PR has IMO a high level of urgency and I wanted
to highlight that.
This said, as we are a volunteer organisation, we do what we feel like and
there is nothing wrong with that
>
> > Could we prioritise reviewing and merging PR#694?
>
> As you know, that is one of the PRs on top of my list. I do not think I
> can "prioritize" it any more than I already am. I even offered to
> implement some of the required changes! Again, if you think I should be
> doing something else instead, please discuss!
>
Sorry, I had failed to match that with the list. My bad, no need to change
anything
Thank you and Amos for responding to the call for action!
--
Francesco
_______________________________________________
squid-dev mailing list
squid-dev@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
